I am ready. Really I am.

imagesAlmost two years after I finished writing Fake Profile and following a successful launch  a few months ago, I recently began to receive requests to take the novel where it needs to go — into schools!

At first, it was a couple of texts from teacher friends suggesting that I should write a teaching program to accompany the book. But since officially launching the paperback version of the novel, I have received much more feedback about the book from parents and teachers, than from the 13 to 15-year-olds with whom it originally seemed to resonate.

The difference in feedback between the two groups is interesting. Parents are adamant that I promote the book in schools; teachers want a teaching program so they can use the book as a stimulus to teach Cybersafety and Digital Citizenship. Both groups see these types of stories on the news and often have to deal with the fallout when social media goes wrong for their charges. But the kids themselves are much more blasé about it. After all, the story of Fake Profile is much more familiar to them. They like the fact that it reflects their reality now.

The most common response I get from kids is “There’s a Brittany-type character at my school and…” They are less surprised by the concept of Fake Profile (…oh yeah, that happened to…) and more interested in the interaction between characters (… I loved the little brothers; they reminded me of my cousins…)

The volume of emails I’ve received from random readers humbles me, and I feel privileged to be in a position to be able to write a teaching program. And now I’m ready. The program is nearly done, the flyers have been designed, and all that is left is to summon the courage to send them out.

See what you think.

Fake Profile Promo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Download a PDF Flyer here: Fake_Profile_promo

 

 

.

Literacy and Democracy: are they one and the same?

digitalwordcloudEffective communication is the cornerstone of a democratic and literate society. And everyone has the right to engage freely. There are few people in the western world who would disagree with this. But the reality is that there are groups of people who have a much more limited capacity to communicate, than perhaps, a generation ago.

To understand why this is, we must first understand the nature of a ‘literate society’. The boundaries of literacy are changing. Where once, literacy meant being able to read and write, these days literacy necessarily incorporates use of the various technologies and platforms utilised to interact meaningfully in society.

So much of our interaction occurs online, that limited access to the hardware (smartphones, tablets, laptops, etc)  means limited engagement. Shopping, watching television, booking accommodation and travel, or movie and concert tickets, paying bills, banking, and importantly – socialising, is increasing conducted in cyberspace. True, these are all first-world activities, but our reality is that if we cannot (or do not or will not) engage at this level, we cannot effectively consume or contribute to the society in which we live.

To all but the digital natives, these things do not come naturally. They need to be taught. And while once teaching our kids to read and write meant arming them with literacy for life, now teaching literacy means so much more than reading and writing. Literacy has become much more about being able to consume and create a range of multimedia in multimodal formats. Teaching kids to become life-long contributing literate members of society means providing them with the skills to decode a range technologies not yet invented, for purposes not yet defined, to engage in occupations not yet created or identified.

But what happens when subsections of the community are not able to access the tools required to become literate entities in this new and emerging technological environment? Are they relegated to a further position of disadvantage because of it? And who might these people be? The answers to these questions may surprise you. It’s not only socio-economic disadvantage that precludes people from engaging meaningfully.

Even if people do have access to the necessary hardware, if we don’t have the knowledge or skills to teach kids effective literacy, how do we teach them appropriate social and economic engagement?

And it’s not just kids who are in danger of becoming less-than-literate in a 21st century sense. There is a generation of older people who have not had access to digital instruction, and their children and grandchildren (gen x-ers and y-s) who may have adopted the technology but are self-taught and not necessarily offay with the ins and outs of effective engagement. It’s these generations who tend to leave themselves wide open and are overrepresented as victims of hackers, identity theft or trolls. And it’s these same generations who are teachers and parents. Therein lay the issue.

Kids are starting school with the knowledge and expectation that they can and will engage and perform technologically at a level that, more often than not, surpasses that of the adults in their lives. Parents and teachers want to do the best by their kids, but working in schools, I get to see both ends of the stick. I hear about kids as young as five accessing the internet on their ipods and DSs, in their bedrooms unsupervised, and scrolling through youtube videos looking for something to watch, and inadvertently accessing a Barbie video – a pornographic parody of a Barbie video. At five years old. At the other end of the scale is the 11-year-old who is not allowed access to social media of any kind, which means she is ostracised from her peer group socially and unable to engage effectively in digital citizenship lessons at school. Both sets of parents want the best for their kids, but both are damaging their kids in irreversible ways by not having a full understanding of what it is to be literate in a digital world.

21st century literacy is about ‘reading’ danger, communicating effectively, differentiating between a ‘selfie’ and sexting. 21st century literacy is about creating meaningful content, engaging in appropriate texting, understanding cyber etiquette, and locking down your profile. 21st century literacy is about understanding copyright and plagiarism, and recognising reliable research. And most importantly 21st century literacy is about knowing how to communicate via soundbite, image, video, and text — appropriately, positively, comfortably and meaningfully. How literate are you in the 21st century?

 

 

 

Writing to a test

testThe NAPLAN testing regime begins again this week, and as happens at this time every year, the media goes into overdrive with analyses of the pros and cons of standardised testing. Some of these reports are well-researched and intelligent critiques of the pitfalls of putting kids as young as seven under the pressure of exam conditions, of the narrowing of the curriculum as educators are coerced into ‘teaching to the test’, of tying funding to test results. And some reports are nothing more than politically motivated scaremongering designed to instil fear in the populace.  But I’m not going to engage in this debate.

I want to focus on just one aspect of standardised testing that I believe is incredibly destructive. Writing. Kids need to learn to write and teachers need to teach them how to do it. There is no argument there. An inspiring teacher is an invaluable resource for a child learning to write. But writing is so much more than developing the technical aspects of grammar and sentence structure.

A child learning to write is like a bird learning to fly. Small steps first. Then as they grow in confidence, they become bolder, knowing that there is support behind them. Safe, supportive environments encourage children to take risks with their writing. Sometimes the risks fail. But it’s not a big deal because with guidance and opportunity, those risks eventually pay-off. And the results are writers who blossom and thrive and develop a life-long love of writing, or at least reading.

But standardised testing is jeopardising this process. Children are becoming nervous. They don’t want to take risks because they don’t want to let their parents and teachers down. They comply with the formats thrust upon them by teachers who are pressured by education bureaucracies and government policy. They write recounts and reports and expositions and maybe a bit of narrative. They remember to use capital letters and full stops and try hard to use nouns and verbs in the right places. And they feel bad about themselves if they don’t score well.

A generation ago, children learned how to write using the ‘whole language approach’. We know now that that approach was not particularly successful. Hindsight taught us that explicit teaching of the technical aspects of writing is necessary. But the pendulum has swung too far and now we are inhibiting the development of creativity in our children by being way too prescriptive in our approach to literacy development. Once again, we’ve missed the mark to the detriment of our kids. And writing in general.

Teachers are well placed to assess student writing. They always have been. And in a classroom environment where the teacher has access to student writing in formal and informal contexts, both on paper and in electronic formats, any teacher worth their salt will recognise the need to instil passion and a desire in children to write. If kids understand the value of writing, if they want to write, they are far more receptive to learning the technical aspects that enable them to strengthen their writing. But if kids are scared of making a mistake, or of disappointing, this too will show up in their attitudes to reading and writing.

Writing is power. But it’s also a joyful, colourful, enriching way to engage with and participate in the world around us. How long before governments get it right?

.

The reader, the writer, and technology – where to next?

the book is deadI’m a little late with my last post because I’ve been lost in my PhD for the past few weeks. I’m researching how young adults source and engage with narrative. It’s because I write for the young adult (YA) demographic that I am very interested in the who, what, when, where and why of YA reading.

I’ve written in this blog before about the changing nature of reading, but getting stuck into the research that backs the anecdotal evidence I gather as a convener of YA writers’ groups is both validating and terrifying.

It’s validating because it reassures me that I am lucky enough to have my finger on the pulse of YA reading attitudes and habits. But it’s terrifying because of the implications for writers of YA fiction. At this point in history, we are experiencing a convergence of the flow of media between traditional and multimodal platforms. And it’s this that is challenging the notion and definition of what it is to read.

Traditionally, narrative content was developed and presented as text on a page to be read in a linear fashion from left-to-right and cover-to-cover. Reading this way required concentration, concentration enough to allow the reader to get carried away by characters and the lost in the plot. Reading had the potential to transport the reader to another time, another place, another reality, and drop them there for days. But the way in which young people read is changing. Instead of sitting somewhere quiet, oblivious to the operations of the mundane and succumbing to the fictional world between the covers of a book – they are skimming the surface of multiple platforms simultaneously without losing themselves completely, in any.

Story is no longer about deciphering and interpreting marks on a page. It’s become more about a multitude of visual and auditory stimuli concurrently bombarding the senses.  Without fully immersing themselves in any single mode of literacy consumption, young people are browsing multiple platforms in an attempt to maximise their absorption of content.

You’d typically find them sitting on the lounge with their iPad on their lap. They’ll be watching TV, playing Minecraft, scrolling through Facebook feeds, chatting with friends via IM. They could be using an App to game, or edit pics, or interact with random TV viewers. They might be tweeting, googling, pinning. Maybe they’re surfing blogs, downloading software or apps or music. But they’re doing several or all of these things AT THE SAME TIME.

So where does actual reading factor into it? If you accept the various Education, Sociology and Anthropology research reports, you’ll note that the nature of general literacy, and YA engagement with it, is changing. Once upon a time, a literate person was one who could recognise text-based symbols on a page and gain some meaning from them. Nowadays, a literate person must not only recognise the various sensory stimuli created by sounds, images – both still and moving, but they must also have a semiotic understanding of the platforms that both create and disseminate these.

Nowadays, a literate person is one who understands the nature of feeds, walls, search engines, youtube, limited character communication, and not only engages with this multimodal means of consuming content, but is also able to create content to contribute to it. Maintaining effective social connections depends on this. So too, does the ability to sift through the proliferation of independently created content, including eBooks,   and make judgement s about what is reliable information and quality content, and what is not.

And writers must be able to rise above the rabble to remain relevant in this technological battleground. But how? How do we, as professionals, maintain the status quo as authors, as constructors of quality fiction? All the evidence suggests that we are headed toward a paperless society. We’ve already seen the explosion of eReaders and eBooks flood the market. Bookshops are collapsing all over the place, publishers are shrinking and morphing into electronic shadows of their former selves in an often vain attempt at relevance in a marketplace that no longer requires a gatekeeper to fiction, and readers are turning to links instead of chapters.

Does this mean writers must become developers to create fiction that YAs want to read/watch/interact with/consume?

I suspect that strong narrative writing will remain where it’s always been, a place where readers seek respite from their chaotic existences, for the experience of losing oneself in another reality. It may just be that the ‘other reality’ for the writer, will turn out to be in cyberspace.

Writing Well

writingisitsownrewardSome might say the value of teaching kids to write well is a redundant concept. As in — of course, kids need to write well, how else will they succeed at school? But when I talk about the importance of teaching to kids to write, I’m talking about so much more than academic achievement.

I’m not suggesting academic achievement is unimportant, it is important. It is a well-known fact that the better a student is able to write, the better they will do at school or university. After all, a great deal of assessment is dependent upon written tasks. This may or may not be the best way to determine effective teaching—I make no judgement about that, but the reality is that writing remains the primary means for students to communicate knowledge and understanding. And they are continually judged on it, beginning with the Naplan tests (current standardised tests for all school students in NSW) in Year 3, and again Years 5, 7 and 9, before they even get to the senior years of schooling. All kids, regardless of age, stage of development, or school are subject to this regime of testing.

But much more important than academic achievement, is developing the capacity to fully engage with all levels of society through effective communication. Writing a fabulous essay might get great marks and a place at university, but writing a heartfelt  letter of thanks, or a deadly letter of complaint; or conveying emotion using the written word where it’s not possible to do so in speech, can mean the difference between being able to connect with people, or not. It can be the difference between social ostracism and social engagement.

We live in a changing world. Multi-modal communication is a fact of 21st Century life. And in the context of the developed world, that means no one need be socially isolated— irrespective of local or global geography. It means the condition of physical or mental health, or socio-economics, is less of a determining factor to engagement and acceptance, than it once may have been. So long as one can write well.

Online communication is more and more becoming the first point of engagement in everything from making friends, to buying a book, to applying for a job, with a myriad of things in between. People are full of judgement, it’s the human condition— and where once they might have made those judgements about the way a person looks, or the way they dress when they arrive for a job interview, nowadays they have already perused the online presence and made those judgements based on written communications. And not just the formal communication. They’ll have read social media sites and developed a sense of the person through the words they’ve used to represent themselves and communicate with their friends. Double-edged sword? Absolutely!

But if people—especially young people, learn to write well and embrace the power of effective communication, they can benefit from a head start to social and economic engagement in ways that were never available to the generations before them. And without having to fit in a box.

Book Launch Success

Cupcakes and book trailers

cupcakeOne might read the title of this post and wonder how cupcakes and book trailers could be connected. After a successful launch for young adult novel Fake Profile, it seems that the star of the show was not the book—though we sold about 50 copies on the night— nor the trailer for the book, though people enjoyed that too. No, the most commented on aspect of the book launch party, was the cupcake phenomenon.

Why? Because it was through the cupcakes that people got to view the trailer. The cupcakes were iced with a special rice paper icing sheet that had a QR code printed onto it using black food colouring. People then were able to scan the QR code with  an app downloaded free from the app store and watch the trailer on their Smartphones or tablet computers.

I’d considered organising a data projector to show the trailer, but I didn’t have one and it seemed like quite a bit of fuss to play a 50-second clip. The cupcake scanning was a fabulous novelty for the mostly adult audience. And though the technology barely raised an eyebrow among the teenage participants, even they were happy to watch the trailer before scoffing the cupcake.

The fact that people wanted to watch the trailer was very good news. These days a book trailer is fairly standard when organising publicity for a novel. It’s a necessary means of promoting the work through social media outlets. And short is good, especially in the young adult market where attention spans have adapted to the immediacy of online info via YouTube and other forms of social media.

Check it out! Scan the photo with your iPhone or iPad (or Smartphone or Android tablet). You’ll need a QR scanner, which you can download free from the App store. Hold the scanner steady over the cupcake and when it loads, watch the trailer!

If you’d like to watch the trailer on your computer screen without scanning the QR code, you can see it here. Let me know what you think.

.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 37 other followers